Fragmented claim documents
Scanned hospital packages, tariff schedules, and coding references arrive as unstructured PDFs across paper, portals, and legacy systems.
Sahabat ClaimCare turns claim packages into validated, risk-scored, citation-backed evidence for payer reviewers — deterministic rules own the facts, AI stays advisory, and reviewers keep final authority on every claim.
Scanned hospital packages, tariff schedules, and coding references arrive as unstructured PDFs across paper, portals, and legacy systems.
Manual ICD-10, ICD-9-CM, and INA-CBG lookups create reviewer variance and slow turnaround on routine claims.
Abuse patterns and tariff variance are difficult to spot at manual review speed across thousands of claims a month.
Payers, regulators, and auditors expect defensible, evidence-backed decisions with a traceable rationale — not opaque approvals.
Sahabat ClaimCare combines document intelligence, medical and tariff validation, explainable risk scoring, and a reviewer workspace on one evidence-first platform — with every AI output attributed back to its source document.
Automated document extraction turns scanned claim packages into structured, validated fields with per-stage confidence scoring.
ICD-10, ICD-9-CM, and INA-CBG semantic mapping with confidence scores, plus hospital tariff normalization against fair-price registries.
Weighted fraud and abuse indicators route claims to auto-approve, manual review, or investigation, with rationale documentation on every score.
Evidence visualization over source documents, an optional context-grounded AI assistant, and idempotent, audit-logged reviewer actions.
| Stage | What it covers |
|---|---|
| Intake and extraction | Automated intake from hospital and payer submissions with document extraction and data validation. |
| Coding and tariff validation | ICD-10 / ICD-9-CM / INA-CBG mapping, medical necessity checks, and tariff normalization against fair-price registries. |
| Risk intelligence | Explainable fraud and abuse scoring with relationship mapping and disposition routing across auto-approve, review, and investigation. |
| Reviewer workspace | Evidence-linked review screen, advisory AI assistant, and decision actions with immutable audit trails. |
| Multi-tenant access control | Payer, provider, and personal workspace scoping with role-based and claim-scoped access control. |
| Monitoring and audit | End-to-end tracing, operational dashboards, and before/after decision records for every reviewer action. |
Deterministic rules establish tariff validity, coding correctness, and claim facts before any AI interpretation is applied.
Every AI-assisted suggestion links back to the extracted evidence it was generated from — no unsupported recommendations.
Access is scoped per claim and workspace, and unsupported or low-confidence evidence routes to human review by default.
Processing, validation, scoring, and reviewer decisions are traced and logged end to end for compliance and tuning.
No. AI is advisory only. Deterministic rules establish tariff validity, coding correctness, and claim facts, while human reviewers retain final authority on every disposition.
ICD-10, ICD-9-CM, and INA-CBG semantic mapping with confidence scoring, plus hospital tariff normalization against fair-price registries.
Yes. Automated intake handles submissions from hospitals and payers, and the platform produces a defensible recommendation and audit trail for your settlement system to consume.
A weighted, explainable indicator model routes claims to auto-approve, manual review, or investigation, with documented rationale and relationship mapping behind every score.